graze-l March 2006: [SPAM] - Re: [SPAM] - RE:
[Graze-l] National Animal Identification System tattoos vs. ear tags - Email
found in subject - Email found in subject
It would be difficult to "change" data on an RFID ... unless it is in
the movies:)
However, government control may even force a strictly biometric ID which
does not require any implant at all and typically could require a
retinal "fingerprint."
Truly a "brave new world" is coming and not all for the good in my
judgement.
Sincerely,
Rick W.
F. W. Owen wrote:
>>do you think tattoos or
>>electronic ID would be more effective and which would be more tamper
>>proof?
>>
>>
>
>Effective for what? Electronic would be far more effective for herd
>management.
>
>But what about absolute, 100% identification in the face of a Hoof and
Mouth,
>TB, or Bangs outbreak? In that case I would want the tattoo.
>
>------
>
>The Iditrod is taking place at this time. All those dogs (over 1000) carry
>electronic ID. I wonder how effective that system is for that purpose.
>
>There would exist powerful incentives to modify the ID of dogs so they
could
>replace dropouts. The prize money is over 3/4 million$,but the glory would
>be a much more powerful incentive than the money.
>
>
>