At 04:24 PM 3/8/2006, Rick wrote:
>However, government control may even force a strictly biometric ID
>which does not require any implant at all and typically could
>require a retinal "fingerprint."
Rick,
I've seen - sometime in the past 5 years or so - some info on doing
muzzle-printing of cattle; perhaps one or more of the breed
associations was or was considering using it as a permanent form of
ID for registered animals - evidently, muzzle prints are as specific
as are fingerprints used for positive ID of humans.
Lucky
